netdev - FW: [RFC net-next 01/10] qed: Add module with basic common support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Sep 2015 05:53:49 +0000
From:	Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
To:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	Ariel Elior <Ariel.Elior@...gic.com>
Subject: FW: [RFC net-next 01/10] qed: Add module with basic common support

> From: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:54:12 +0300

> >  Documentation/networking/LICENSE.qlogic            |  288 ++

> I do not want to get into the habit of having to add copy after copy
> of the GPL v2 to the source tree, so this is rather inappropriate.

> Everything said in that file is explicitly covered by the top-level
> COPYING file.

You're right; We'll remove this and add some comment reference
to COPYING instead in v2.

On a related but different topic,  I've noticed a lack of commentary
for this series; Don't know if it's due to lack of time, interest, or
something else.
[I know we write perfect code [ ;-) ], but I would have guessed that
Adding 10Ks of lines of code to the kernel would generate at least
some rejects].
Should we wait any longer before sending the next revision?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html