[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a8smsntp.fsf@belgarion.home>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:41:54 +0200
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: nico@...xnic.net, arnd@...db.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: smc91x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 21:26:04 +0200
>
>> Convert the dma transfers to be dmaengine based, now pxa has a dmaengine
>> slave driver. This makes this driver a bit more PXA agnostic.
>>
>> The driver was tested on pxa27x (mainstone) and pxa310 (zylonite),
>> ie. only pxa platforms.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
>> Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> ---
>> This has potential to break other platform such as Neponset, Idp,
>> halibut and qsd8x50, so I added Russell and Arnd as they were discussing
>> smc91x support last February.
>
> Is someone testing whether such platforms break or not? I'm waiting for
> that before I consider applying this patch.
My understanding is that Russell is the only one left testing them, or at least
he was the only one complaining about a breakage lately on neponset.
I can wait several weeks for Russell to have a bit of time to try : I know it
will compile correctly at least for neponset, and I know almost all the code is
under #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_PXA. And still I would feel far more comfortable if it
was tested, just as you.
Cheers.
--
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists