netdev - Re: Possible netlink autobind regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150917113034.GA14471@htj.duckdns.org>
Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 07:30:34 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>, kafai@...com,
	kernel-team <kernel-team@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Possible netlink autobind regression

Hello, Herbert.

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 01:15:03PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> netlink: Fix autobind race condition that leads to zero port ID
> 
> The commit c0bb07df7d981e4091432754e30c9c720e2c0c78 ("netlink:
> Reset portid after netlink_insert failure") introduced a race
> condition where if two threads tried to autobind the same socket
> one of them may end up with a zero port ID.
>
> This patch reverts that commit and instead fixes it by introducing
> a separte "bound" variable to indicate whether a user-space socket
> has been bound.
> 
> Fixes: c0bb07df7d98 ("netlink: Reset portid after netlink_insert failure")
> Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Reviewed-by: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>

Maybe add that this led to a deadlock and add a Link tag to this
thread?

> @@ -1083,10 +1083,12 @@ static int netlink_insert(struct sock *sk, u32 portid)
>  	if (err) {
>  		if (err == -EEXIST)
>  			err = -EADDRINUSE;
> -		nlk_sk(sk)->portid = 0;
>  		sock_put(sk);
> +		goto err;
>  	}
>  
> +	nlk_sk(sk)->bound = !!portid;

!! isn't necessasry and this creates ordering between two stores.
->bound must be visible only after ->portid is visible, so this should
be smp_store_release().

> @@ -2371,7 +2373,7 @@ static int netlink_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
>  		dst_group = nlk->dst_group;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!nlk->portid) {
> +	if (!nlk->bound) {

And all unlocked reads should be smp_load_acquire().

>  		err = netlink_autobind(sock);
>  		if (err)
>  			goto out;

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html