lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150918085614.GA3700@salvia>
Date:	Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:56:14 +0200
From:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	ebiederm@...ssion.com, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next 0/30] Passing net through the netfilter hooks

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 05:19:04PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:59:49 -0500
> 
> > Pablo, Dave I don't know whose tree this makes more sense to go
> > through.  I am assuming at least initially Pablos as netfilter is
> > involved.  From what I have seen there will be a lot of back and forth
> > between the netfilter code paths and the routing code paths.
> 
> I think it might reduce conflicts actually if it went via my net-next
> tree.
> 
> Pablo, any objections?

This looks good, thanks for taking these David.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ