lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 20 Sep 2015 23:53:17 -0700
From:	Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] net: Handle negative checksum offset in skb-checksum-help

VXLAN device can receive skb with checksum partial. But the checksum
offset could be in outer header which is pulled on receive. This results
in negative checksum offset for the skb. Such skb can cause the assert
failure in skb_checksum_help(). The patch fixes the bug by checking for
negative offset in skb_checksum_help().

Following is the kernel panic msg from old kernel hitting the bug.

------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at net/core/dev.c:1906!
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81518034>] skb_checksum_help+0x144/0x150
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
[<ffffffffa0164c28>] queue_userspace_packet+0x408/0x470 [openvswitch]
[<ffffffffa016614d>] ovs_dp_upcall+0x5d/0x60 [openvswitch]
[<ffffffffa0166236>] ovs_dp_process_packet_with_key+0xe6/0x100 [openvswitch]
[<ffffffffa016629b>] ovs_dp_process_received_packet+0x4b/0x80 [openvswitch]
[<ffffffffa016c51a>] ovs_vport_receive+0x2a/0x30 [openvswitch]
[<ffffffffa0171383>] vxlan_rcv+0x53/0x60 [openvswitch]
[<ffffffffa01734cb>] vxlan_udp_encap_recv+0x8b/0xf0 [openvswitch]
[<ffffffff8157addc>] udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x2dc/0x3b0
[<ffffffff8157b56f>] __udp4_lib_rcv+0x1cf/0x6c0
[<ffffffff8157ba7a>] udp_rcv+0x1a/0x20
[<ffffffff8154fdbd>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0xdd/0x280
[<ffffffff81550128>] ip_local_deliver+0x88/0x90
[<ffffffff8154fa7d>] ip_rcv_finish+0x10d/0x370
[<ffffffff81550365>] ip_rcv+0x235/0x300
[<ffffffff8151ba1d>] __netif_receive_skb+0x55d/0x620
[<ffffffff8151c360>] netif_receive_skb+0x80/0x90
[<ffffffff81459935>] virtnet_poll+0x555/0x6f0
[<ffffffff8151cd04>] net_rx_action+0x134/0x290
[<ffffffff810683d8>] __do_softirq+0xa8/0x210
[<ffffffff8162fe6c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[<ffffffff810161a5>] do_softirq+0x65/0xa0
[<ffffffff810687be>] irq_exit+0x8e/0xb0
[<ffffffff81630733>] do_IRQ+0x63/0xe0
[<ffffffff81625f2e>] common_interrupt+0x6e/0x6e

Reported-by: Anupam Chanda <achanda@...are.com>
Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
---
 net/core/dev.c |    4 +++-
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index ee0d628..008f1ae 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2408,6 +2408,9 @@ int skb_checksum_help(struct sk_buff *skb)
 		skb_warn_bad_offload(skb);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
+	offset = skb_checksum_start_offset(skb);
+	if (offset < 0)
+		goto out_set_summed;
 
 	/* Before computing a checksum, we should make sure no frag could
 	 * be modified by an external entity : checksum could be wrong.
@@ -2418,7 +2421,6 @@ int skb_checksum_help(struct sk_buff *skb)
 			goto out;
 	}
 
-	offset = skb_checksum_start_offset(skb);
 	BUG_ON(offset >= skb_headlen(skb));
 	csum = skb_checksum(skb, offset, skb->len - offset, 0);
 
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ