[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150920.214518.331533621425531441.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 21:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: nforro@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net: Fix behaviour of unreachable, blackhole and
prohibit routes
From: Nikola Forró <nforro@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:01:32 +0200
> Man page of ip-route(8) says following about route types:
>
> unreachable - these destinations are unreachable. Packets are dis‐
> carded and the ICMP message host unreachable is generated. The local
> senders get an EHOSTUNREACH error.
>
> blackhole - these destinations are unreachable. Packets are dis‐
> carded silently. The local senders get an EINVAL error.
>
> prohibit - these destinations are unreachable. Packets are discarded
> and the ICMP message communication administratively prohibited is
> generated. The local senders get an EACCES error.
>
> In the inet6 address family, this was correct, except the local senders
> got ENETUNREACH error instead of EHOSTUNREACH in case of unreachable route.
> In the inet address family, all three route types generated ICMP message
> net unreachable, and the local senders got ENETUNREACH error.
>
> In both address families all three route types now behave consistently
> with documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikola Forró <nforro@...hat.com>
Applied, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists