netdev - [net-next 08/17] e1000: remove dead e1000_init_eeprom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:54:27 -0700
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com, jogreene@...hat.com,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: [net-next 08/17] e1000: remove dead e1000_init_eeprom_params calls

From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>

The device probe method e1000_probe calls e1000_init_eeprom_params
itself so there's no reason to call it again from e1000_do_write_eeprom
or e1000_do_read_eeprom.

The sentence above assumes that e1000_init_eeprom_params is effective.
e1000_init_eeprom_params depends mostly on hw->mac_type and e1000_probe
bails out early if it can't set mac_type (see e1000_init_hw_struct, then
e1000_set_mac_type), qed.

Btw, if effective, the removed paths would had been deadlock prone when
e1000_eeprom_spi was set:
-> e1000_write_eeprom (takes e1000_eeprom_lock)
   -> e1000_do_write_eeprom
      -> e1000_init_eeprom_params
         -> e1000_read_eeprom (takes e1000_eeprom_lock)

(same narrative with e1000_read_eeprom -> e1000_do_read_eeprom etc.)

As a final note, the candidate deadlock above can't happen in e1000_probe
due to the way eeprom->word_size is set / tested.

Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
index 45c8c864..b1af0d6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
@@ -3900,10 +3900,6 @@ static s32 e1000_do_read_eeprom(struct e1000_hw *hw, u16 offset, u16 words,
 		return E1000_SUCCESS;
 	}
 
-	/* If eeprom is not yet detected, do so now */
-	if (eeprom->word_size == 0)
-		e1000_init_eeprom_params(hw);
-
 	/* A check for invalid values:  offset too large, too many words, and
 	 * not enough words.
 	 */
@@ -4074,10 +4070,6 @@ static s32 e1000_do_write_eeprom(struct e1000_hw *hw, u16 offset, u16 words,
 		return E1000_SUCCESS;
 	}
 
-	/* If eeprom is not yet detected, do so now */
-	if (eeprom->word_size == 0)
-		e1000_init_eeprom_params(hw);
-
 	/* A check for invalid values:  offset too large, too many words, and
 	 * not enough words.
 	 */
-- 
2.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html