[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADVnQymZthkRV1UtxxptGiw06T7ZqTuPsqz6_Ks974F3QYbO0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:34:16 -0400
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
To: Bendik Rønning Opstad <bro.devel@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Andreas Petlund <apetlund@...ula.no>,
Carsten Griwodz <griff@...ula.no>,
Jonas Markussen <jonassm@....uio.no>,
Kenneth Klette Jonassen <kennetkl@....uio.no>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: Fix CWV being too strict on thin streams
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Bendik Rønning Opstad
<bro.devel@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com> wrote:
>> > More generally, my sense is that we should tweak the is_cwnd_limited code to
>> > shift from saying "set is_cwnd_limited to true iff the cwnd is known to be
>> > limiting transmits" to saying "set is_cwnd_limited to true iff the packets in
>> > flight fill the cwnd".
...
> This fixes the identified problem and is a good fix as far as our tests show.
>
> Should I resend this as PATCH v2?
Yes, please send this latest patch as a v2, with an updated commit
message, to reflect the latest diagnosis/rationale.
Thanks!
neal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists