netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Convert smsc911x to use ACPI as well as DT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1443042212.74600.30.camel@infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 23 Sep 2015 22:03:32 +0100
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, steve.glendinning@...well.net,
	grant.likely@...aro.org, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com,
	Catalin.Marinas@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Convert smsc911x to use ACPI as well as DT

On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 22:51 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> But if the device ID is assigned already, why would it hurt to 
> actually use it?

It doesn't hurt at all, as long as we understand that there was no need
to assign it a device ID at all, at least for Linux's benefit. And as
long as it doesn't set a precedent that makes other people think they
need to do so.

-- 
dwmw2


Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5691 bytes)