netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] netlink: Replace rhash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150924034116.GC26853@htj.duckdns.org>
Date:	Wed, 23 Sep 2015 23:41:16 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, cwang@...pensource.com,
	tom@...bertland.com, kafai@...com, kernel-team@...com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jiri@...nulli.us,
	nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, tgraf@...g.ch, sfeldma@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netlink: Replace rhash_portid with bound

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:31:17AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> No this isn't what happened.  My error was trying to see if there
> is a way to do it without barriers.  In the end there wasn't.  This
> has nothing to do with using primitives.

Hmmm... yeah, you can say that, but it still was a failure to
recognize and apply the common pattern and what you're suggesting is
deviating for no good reason.  It demands a lot of cognitive overhead
for something which should be routine and makes the code a lot more
fragile as a result.  Things like this make barrier usages difficult
to understand and verify because it takes away a lot of ready-made
cognitive tools.  So, let's please stick to the known pattern.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html