netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] switchdev: push bridge attributes down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150925015305.GA25275@lunn.ch>
Date:	Fri, 25 Sep 2015 03:53:05 +0200
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:	sfeldma@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...nulli.us,
	siva.mannem.lnx@...il.com, pjonnala@...adcom.com,
	stephen@...workplumber.org, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
	vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] switchdev: push bridge attributes down

> So, without a better device to hold that kind of information (in the
> future it could be a global, switch-specific device holding that
> information), I agree with your decision to take the bridge device to
> hold that attribute, it still feels a bit uncomfortable to have
> switchdev_attr_port() take a bridge device parameter, but whatever, here
> is a scenario I am wondering how we would want to proceed with:
> 
> - suppose we have a switch which is only able to control ageing
> globally, not per port or any other kind of logical domain

Marvell switches only have global ageing settings, and it has to be a
multiple of 15 seconds, from 0 to 3825 seconds.

	 Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html