netdev - Re: [Linux 4.2-rc8+...v4.3-rc2] REGRESSION: ppp: circular locking dependency detected: [pppd] ppp_dev_uninit()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:46:46 +0200
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	g.nault@...halink.fr,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux 4.2-rc8+...v4.3-rc2] REGRESSION: ppp: circular locking
 dependency detected: [pppd] ppp_dev_uninit() | rtnl_lock()

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:00 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
>> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 18:19:16 +0200
>>
>>> OK, I guess DaveM will take your patch into net.git#master first...
>>> and tag it there with CC-stable?
>>
>> I do not tag anything with stable.
>>
>> I queue it up into a patchwork bundle and explicitly submit those
>> patches to stable@...r.kernel.org at a time of my own choosing.
>>
>> This is a FAQ, documented in the kernel Documentation/ subdirectory.
>
> OK, so this is a special handling for netdev?
> I normally look at "SubmittingPatches" documentation [1] and looked in
> this case especially at [2].
> Can you point me to this "FAQ"?
>

OK, I found it by myself.

[ Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt ]

"Procedure for submitting patches to the -stable tree:

 - If the patch covers files in net/ or drivers/net please follow netdev stable
   submission guidelines as described in
   Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt"

[ Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt ]

 "Q: I have created a network patch and I think it should be backported to
   stable.  Should I add a "Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org" like the references
   in the kernel's Documentation/ directory say?

A: No.  See above answer.  In short, if you think it really belongs in
   stable, then ensure you write a decent commit log that describes who
   gets impacted by the bugfix and how it manifests itself, and when the
   bug was introduced.  If you do that properly, then the commit will
   get handled appropriately and most likely get put in the patchworks
   stable queue if it really warrants it.

   If you think there is some valid information relating to it being in
   stable that does _not_ belong in the commit log, then use the three
   dash marker line as described in Documentation/SubmittingPatches to
   temporarily embed that information into the patch that you send."

[3] collects all netdev "stable" patches.

I hope I remember that for the next time dealing with such issues.

- Sedat -

[1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt#n30
[2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt#n155
[3] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/?state=*

> Where do you include Guillaume's patch - in net.git#master?
>
> Since Linux v4.2 my Internet connection via UMTS/HSPA USB modem is "unstable".
> For me this is an important fix.
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Sedat -
>
> [1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> [2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/SubmittingPatches#n297
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html