[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5609462E.9060308@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 15:52:46 +0200
From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...sung.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Pratyush Anand <pratyush.anand@...il.com>,
target-devel@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/23] usb-gadget/f_loopback: use per-attribute show and
store methods
Hi,
W dniu 28.09.2015 o 15:41, Christoph Hellwig pisze:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 01:46:57PM +0200, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static struct f_lb_opts_attribute f_lb_opts_qlen =
>>> - __CONFIGFS_ATTR(qlen, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
>>> - f_lb_opts_qlen_show,
>>> - f_lb_opts_qlen_store);
>>> -
>> In my opinion the below line belongs here:
>>
>> +CONFIGFS_ATTR(f_lb_opts_, qlen);
>
> The idea is to keep all the attribute defintions near the attribute
> array, similar to how most drivers define their sysfs attributes.
>
You were not consistent with the approach, though: with some
patches CONFIGFS_ATTR() are where __CONFIGFS_ATTR were,
with some other they are grouped.
> If you really don't like that way I'll move it back.
I think the change is more explicit/readable if the macro invocations
are where what they substitute used to be.
AP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists