[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150929.145732.752475022422386278.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: aduyck@...antis.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2] netpoll: Drop budget parameter from NAPI
polling call hierarchy
From: Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 09:16:17 -0700
> For some reason we were carrying the budget value around between the
> various calls to napi->poll. If for example one of the drivers called had
> a bug in which it returned a non-zero value for work this could result in
> the budget value becoming negative.
>
> Rather than carry around a value of budget that is 0 or less we can instead
> just loop through and pass 0 to each napi->poll call. If any driver
> returns a value for work done that is non-zero then we can report that
> driver and continue rather than allowing a bad actor to make the budget
> value negative and pass that negative value to napi->poll.
>
> Note, the only actual change here is that instead of letting budget become
> negative we are keeping it at 0 regardless of the value returned for work
> since it should not be possible for the polling routine to do any actual
> work with a budget of 0. So if the polling routine returns a non-0 value
> we are just reporting it and continuing with a budget of 0 rather than
> letting that work value be subtracted from the budget of 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com>
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists