netdev - RE: [RFC v2 net-next 05/10] qede: Add basic network device support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <B5657A6538887040AD3A81F1008BEC63E351A3@avmb3.qlogic.org>
Date:	Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:54:32 +0000
From:	Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
To:	Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ariel Elior <Ariel.Elior@...gic.com>,
	Sudarsana Kalluru <Sudarsana.Kalluru@...gic.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC v2 net-next 05/10] qede: Add basic network device support

> > >> > +struct qede_rx_queue {
> > >> > +	__le16			*hw_cons_ptr;
> > >>
> > >> The __ variants of constants should be reserved for use in user
> > >> visible API's
> > >
> > > Really? If so, this needs to be fixed not only here but in lots of
> > > places in the series [e.g., entire HW HSI uses __le variants instead of le].
> > > But why is it so? I.e., I understand that __le16 is defined in the
> > > uapi directory and thus accessible to users, but why the distinction?
> >
> > Because it shows whether the type is something exposed to userspace or not.
> >
> > If there are places where this is done incorrectly in the tree, it is
> > not a legitimate reason for you to do so as well.
> 
> Obviously.
> We'll fix all of those for next version.

I've taken a look and I couldn't find reference to 'le16' anywhere under
drivers/net/ethernet/. And 'le16' is actually a fs/ntfs/types.h definition.

What am I missing here?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html