[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lhbot3pk.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:51:51 +0100
From: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com>
To: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
Cc: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Olivier Mauras <olivier@...ras.ch>,
PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"peterz\@infradead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"davem\@davemloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: List corruption on epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DEL) an AF_UNIX socket
Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com> writes:
> On 30 September 2015 at 15:25, Rainer Weikusat
> <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com> wrote:
>> Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com> writes:
>>> On 30 September 2015 at 12:56, Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com> wrote:
>>>> In case you want some information on this: This is a kernel warning I
>>>> could trigger (more than once) on the single day I could so far spend
>>>> looking into this (3.2.54 kernel):
>>>>
>>>> Sep 15 19:37:19 doppelsaurus kernel: WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:53 list_del+0x9/0x30()
>>>> Sep 15 19:37:19 doppelsaurus kernel: Hardware name: 500-330nam
>>>> Sep 15 19:37:19 doppelsaurus kernel: list_del corruption. prev->next should be ffff88022c38f078, but was dead000000100100
>>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> Is that with Jason's patch or a vanilla v3.2.54?
>>
>> That's a kernel warning which occurred repeatedly (among other "link
>> pointer disorganization" warnings) when I tested the "program with
>> unknown behaviour" you wrote with the kernel I'm currently supporting a
>> while ago (as I already wrote in the original mail).
>
> So I assume Jason's patch is not included in your kernel. Then those
> messages are expected; expected even on kernels as old as v2.6.27.
> Can you re-try with Jason's patch applied?
If something needs to be unregistered here (which I don't claim to
know but someone should), the corresponding code would need to be added
to the unix_dgram_disconnected function (as was already pointed
out).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists