netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] cxgb4: For T4, don't read the Firmware Mailbox Control register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <560BF6CF.8050208@cogentembedded.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:50:55 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:	Hariprasad Shenai <hariprasad@...lsio.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, leedom@...lsio.com, nirranjan@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] cxgb4: For T4, don't read the Firmware
 Mailbox Control register

Hello.

On 09/30/2015 05:24 PM, Hariprasad Shenai wrote:

> T4 doesn't have the Shadow copy of the register which we can read without
> side effect. So don't read mbox control register for T4 adapter
>
> Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Shenai <hariprasad@...lsio.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_debugfs.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_debugfs.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_debugfs.c
> index 0a87a32..c20b41c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_debugfs.c
> @@ -1134,12 +1134,20 @@ static int mbox_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>   	unsigned int mbox = (uintptr_t)seq->private & 7;
>   	struct adapter *adap = seq->private - mbox;
>   	void __iomem *addr = adap->regs + PF_REG(mbox, CIM_PF_MAILBOX_DATA_A);
> -	unsigned int ctrl_reg = (is_t4(adap->params.chip)
> -				 ? CIM_PF_MAILBOX_CTRL_A
> -				 : CIM_PF_MAILBOX_CTRL_SHADOW_COPY_A);
> -	void __iomem *ctrl = adap->regs + PF_REG(mbox, ctrl_reg);
>
> -	i = MBOWNER_G(readl(ctrl));
> +	/* For T4 we don't have a shadow copy of the Mailbox Control register.
> +	 * And since reading that real register causes a side effect of
> +	 * granting ownership, we're best of simply not reading it at all.
> +	 */
> +	if (is_t4(adap->params.chip))
> +		i = 4; /* index of "<unread>" */

    The kernel CodingStyle dictates that you should enclose all branches in {} 
if at least one branch has it.

> +	else {
> +		unsigned int ctrl_reg = CIM_PF_MAILBOX_CTRL_SHADOW_COPY_A;
> +		void __iomem *ctrl = adap->regs + PF_REG(mbox, ctrl_reg);
> +
> +		i = MBOWNER_G(readl(ctrl));
> +	}
> +
>   	seq_printf(seq, "mailbox owned by %s\n\n", owner[i]);
>
>   	for (i = 0; i < MBOX_LEN; i += 8)

MBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html