netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net/rds: Use a single TCP socket for both send and receive.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:13:47 -0700
From:	santosh shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
To:	Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, rds-devel@....oracle.com,
	ajaykumar.hotchandani@...cle.com, igor.maximov@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net/rds: Use a single TCP socket for both
 send and receive.

On 9/30/2015 9:09 AM, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
> On (09/30/15 08:50), santosh shilimkar wrote:
>>>   	rs_tcp = (struct rds_tcp_connection *)conn->c_transport_data;
>>> -	WARN_ON(!rs_tcp || rs_tcp->t_sock);
>>> +	if (rs_tcp->t_sock && inet->inet_saddr < inet->inet_daddr) {
>>> +		struct sock *nsk = new_sock->sk;
>>>
>> Any reason you dropped the WARN_ON. Note that till we got commit
>> 74e98eb0 (" RDS: verify the underlying transport exists before creating
>> a connection") merged, we had an issue. That guards it now.
>
> That was done deliberately. Now that we have only one tcp socket,
> we can run into an rds_tcp_connection for an outgoing connection
> that we initiated, thus rs_tcp->t_sock can be non-null - which is
> why a new check is added in the newly added line in the patch.
>
Thanks for clarification.

Regards,
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html