[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <560C296C.9080403@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 21:26:52 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi.ks@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 net-next 3/4] ravb: Document binding for r8a7795
SoC
Hello.
On 09/14/2015 03:42 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
Sorry for delayed reply, I thought I'd already replied to this. :-/
>>> From: Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi.ks@...esas.com>
>>>
>>> This patch updates the ravb binding to support the r8a7795 SoC by:
>>> - Adding a compat string for the new hardware
>>> - Adding 25 named interrupts to binding for the new SoC;
>>> older SoCs continue to use a single multiplexed interrupt
>>>
>>> The example is also updated to reflect the r8a7795 as this is the
>>> more complex case.
>>>
>>> Based on work by Kazuya Mizuguchi and others.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> v2
>>> * First post; broken out of a driver update patch
>>> * As discussed with Geert Uytterhoeven and Sergei Shtylyov
>>> - Binding: Make all interrupts mandatory as named-interrupts of
>>> the form ch%u
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/net/renesas,ravb.txt | 65 +++++++++++++++++++---
>>> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/renesas,ravb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/renesas,ravb.txt
>>> index 1fd8831437bf..6c360f993d33 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/renesas,ravb.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/renesas,ravb.txt
>> [...]
>>> @@ -27,13 +33,46 @@ Optional properties:
>>> Example:
>>>
>>> ethernet@...00000 {
>>> - compatible = "renesas,etheravb-r8a7790";
>>> - reg = <0 0xe6800000 0 0x800>, <0 0xee0e8000 0 0x4000>;
>>> + compatible = "renesas,etheravb-r8a7795";
>>> + reg = <0 0xe6800000 0 0x800>, <0 0xe6a00000 0 0x10000>;
>>> interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
>>> - interrupts = <0 163 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> - clocks = <&mstp8_clks R8A7790_CLK_ETHERAVB>;
>>> - phy-mode = "rmii";
>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 39 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 40 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 41 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 42 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 43 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 44 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 45 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 46 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 47 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 48 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 49 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 50 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 51 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 52 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 53 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 54 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 55 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 56 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 57 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 58 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 59 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 60 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 61 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 62 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 63 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> + interrupt-names = "ch0", "ch1", "ch2", "ch3",
>>> + "ch4", "ch5", "ch6", "ch7",
>>> + "ch8", "ch9", "ch10", "ch11",
>>> + "ch12", "ch13", "ch14", "ch15",
>>> + "ch16", "ch17", "ch18", "ch19",
>>> + "ch20", "ch21", "ch22", "ch23",
>>> + "ch24";
>>
>> To me, these names don't look very helpful. You could as well omit them
>> and use platform_get_irq() with the channel #.
> These names reflect the hardware; which is the aim of DT.
Indeed (I've looked into the manuals by now). They just look poorly
chosen. :-)
> As I believe you pointed out earlier it is preferred to use named
> interrupts when there is more than one. Do I misunderstand the situation
> there?
Yes.
> If you have a positive contribution to make regarding better names then
> I am all ears.
I liked your "tx<n>", "rx<n>" variant better...
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists