[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151004214802.GB6032@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 23:48:02 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, fw@...len.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: remove the nh_scope test in
rpfilter_lookup_reverse of ipt_rpfilter
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com> wrote:
> it seems the test is bogus and can be removed to fix this issue.
>
> if (dev_match || flags & XT_RPFILTER_LOOSE)
> return FIB_RES_NH(res).nh_scope <= RT_SCOPE_HOST;
>
> ipv6 does not have this issue.
netfilter patches should be sent to netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
> #endif
> - if (dev_match || flags & XT_RPFILTER_LOOSE)
> - return FIB_RES_NH(res).nh_scope <= RT_SCOPE_HOST;
> return dev_match;
> }
This breaks --loose option, no?
Thats why I earlier suggested to change this to
> - if (dev_match || flags & XT_RPFILTER_LOOSE)
> - return FIB_RES_NH(res).nh_scope <= RT_SCOPE_HOST;
+ return dev_match || flags & XT_RPFILTER_LOOSE;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists