[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE4R7bA6+_WUQ5BXD54zQK7DM64P3FS5D+TdUc1gcpbjd1+oZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 08:41:29 -0700
From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>, eladr@...lanox.com,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 09/14] rocker: add rtnl ops for port mode [gs]etting
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>
> Introduce a stub for allowing user to change rocker port world/mode.
> This is implemented using rtnl changelink op.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
[cut]
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> index 3a5f263..7da768e 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> @@ -416,6 +416,17 @@ enum {
> };
> #define IFLA_GENEVE_MAX (__IFLA_GENEVE_MAX - 1)
>
> +/* Rocker section */
> +enum {
> + IFLA_ROCKER_UNSPEC,
> + IFLA_ROCKER_MODE,
> + __IFLA_ROCKER_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +#define IFLA_ROCKER_MAX (__IFLA_ROCKER_MAX - 1)
> +
> +#define ROCKER_MODE_MAX 16
Does this mean there is going to be a "ip link set dev DEV type rocker
mode MODE" command option?
It doesn't seem right to be adding driver-specific IFLA_'s here. I
think this sets bad precedence for other drivers to add their own
knobs without thinking about a generic shared mechanism.
Actually, I don't see the point of letting the user dynamically change
the port mode. I would prefer this knob be moved to qemu/rocker. Let
the port mode be specified on device creation.
-scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists