lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE4R7bA6+_WUQ5BXD54zQK7DM64P3FS5D+TdUc1gcpbjd1+oZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 5 Oct 2015 08:41:29 -0700
From:	Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>, eladr@...lanox.com,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 09/14] rocker: add rtnl ops for port mode [gs]etting

On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>
> Introduce a stub for allowing user to change rocker port world/mode.
> This is implemented using rtnl changelink op.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>

[cut]

> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> index 3a5f263..7da768e 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> @@ -416,6 +416,17 @@ enum {
>  };
>  #define IFLA_GENEVE_MAX        (__IFLA_GENEVE_MAX - 1)
>
> +/* Rocker section */
> +enum {
> +       IFLA_ROCKER_UNSPEC,
> +       IFLA_ROCKER_MODE,
> +       __IFLA_ROCKER_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +#define IFLA_ROCKER_MAX        (__IFLA_ROCKER_MAX - 1)
> +
> +#define ROCKER_MODE_MAX 16

Does this mean there is going to be a "ip link set dev DEV type rocker
mode MODE" command option?

It doesn't seem right to be adding driver-specific IFLA_'s here.  I
think this sets bad precedence for other drivers to add their own
knobs without thinking about a generic shared mechanism.

Actually, I don't see the point of letting the user dynamically change
the port mode.  I would prefer this knob be moved to qemu/rocker.  Let
the port mode be specified on device creation.

-scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ