[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151005122459.GG2911@alphalink.fr>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 14:24:59 +0200
From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@...halink.fr>
To: Matt Bennett <Matt.Bennett@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: "nuclearcat@...learcat.com" <nuclearcat@...learcat.com>,
"core@....lg.ua" <core@....lg.ua>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ppp: don't override sk->sk_state in pppoe_flush_dev()
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 04:08:51AM +0000, Matt Bennett wrote:
> Hi, I am seeing this panic occur occasionally however I am unsure how to
> go about reproducing it. Is it enough to simply keep creating and
> tearing down the PPP interface? I can also test and/or investigate this
> issue if a suitable reproduction method is available.
>
There are at least two issues resulting in similar Oops.
The first one goes with MTU/address/link state updates on the
underlying interface: any such update on an interface used by a
PPPoE connection will generally result in an Oops when releasing the
PPPoE connection. This is fixed by e6740165b8f7 ("ppp: don't override
sk->sk_state in pppoe_flush_dev()").
The second one seems to be trickier. It looks like a race wrt. PADT
message reception. Reproducing the bug will probably require to
generate some PADT flooding to a host that creates and releases PPPoE
connections.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists