[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151005145842.GD8673@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 16:58:42 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: "Rosen, Rami" <rami.rosen@...el.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"eladr@...lanox.com" <eladr@...lanox.com>,
"idosch@...lanox.com" <idosch@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: HW communication debugging interface - ideas?
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 04:55:42PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 04:49:41PM CEST, andrew@...n.ch wrote:
> >> >Are you referring here to messages of the EMAD protocol ?
> >
> >I know nothing about this protocol.....
> >
> >Does it at least use standard Ethernet framing? Source and Destination
> >header and an EtherType which mean EMAD?
>
> Yep, but that does not really matter. I believe we should find debugging
> interface which is protocol agnostic. Just arbitrary messages
> monitoring.
Hi Jiri
O.K, it is just that you mentioned wireshark. Passing the frames to
network interface taps would make this trivial.
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists