netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] regmap: only call custom reg_update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <ABC562FD-5DE5-452E-8DE6-1C436E37E8BE@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2015 08:50:43 -0400
From:	Jon Ringle <jonringle@...il.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"jon@...gle.org" <jon@...gle.org>,
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"jringle@...dpoint.com" <jringle@...dpoint.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regmap: only call custom reg_update_bits() if reg is marked volatile


> On Oct 6, 2015, at 6:13 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 11:29:56PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> 
>>> Dave, to be clear please do *not* apply this patch at least for the time
>>> being - I've not reviewed it or the one from Thursday that you applied
>>> this morning.
> 
>> It's applied, it's pushed out to my tree, and therefore this will need to
>> be fixed up with a relative patch of some sort.
> 
> This appears to be an incremental change, not the initial commit which
> you already applied.  I'm asking you to stop applying changes to regmap
> which have not been reviewed.
> 
>> What you don't seem to understand is that my GIT tree is never rebased
>> or mangled because many people depend upon it.  So once a patch is
>> applied, that commit lives on forever.
> 
> I'm not *so* concerned if the patch lives in history, I'm concerned with
> having something I can sensibly review and ideally getting the code into
> my tree.

I would suggest the following course of action:

1) David, revert the following from net-next:
$ git revert 9886ce2b9d4e5a8bb3d78d0f7eff3c0f1ed58d67
$ git revert 04fbfce7a222327b97ca165294ef19f0faa45960
$ git revert 7741c373cf3ea1f5383fa97fb7a640a429d3dd7c

2) Mark, please use the patch titled "[PATCH net-next v3 1/2] regmap:
Allow installing custom". It will apply cleanly to the regmap for-next
branch
3) Once Mark has accepted this patch into the regmap tree, I will make
any adjustments needed to the net-next patch.
4) David should then merge the regmap for-next branch into net-next
5) I will submit a new patch to net-next for the encx24j600 driver
that should build against the regmap changes

Sound like a good plan?

-Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html