[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE4R7bAymAKeKBOwPP11QDvBYR-iCMg3VD_7qBZH+n_+f-x9WA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 20:56:12 -0700
From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>, eladr@...lanox.com,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 00/13] rocker: add support for multiple worlds
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>
> This patchset allows new rocker worlds to be easily added in future (like eBPF
> based one I have been working on). The main part of the patchset is the OF-DPA
> carve-out. It resuts in OF-DPA specific file. Clean cut.
>
> v1->v2:
> - rtnl rocker mode change userspace expose patch was removed
>
> Jiri Pirko (13):
> rocker: remove unused rocker_port param from alloc funcs and shorten
> their names
> rocker: rename rocker.h to rocker_hw.h
> rocker: rename rocker.c to rocker_main.c
> rocker: push tlv processing into separate files
> rocker: implement set settings mode command
> rocker: introduce worlds infrastructure
> rocker: introduce OF-DPA world skeleton
> rocker: set default world on port probe and clean world on remove
> rocker: pass "learning" value as a parameter to
> rocker_port_set_learning
> rocker: pre-allocate wait structures during cmd ring init
> rocker: remove trans parameter to rocker_cmd_exec function
> rocker: call rocker_cmd_exec function with "nowait" boolean instead of
> flags
> rocker: move OF-DPA stuff into separate file
A couple of my tests are failing with this patchset. A simple port
test is failing and IPv4 routing test is failing.
The port test is simple: just connect a port on DUT to a port on
another system and assign an IP address to each port and verify IP
connectivity. I have this:
DUT:sw1p1 (11.0.0.1/24) <-----------> host1:eth0 (11.0.0.2/24)
The IPv4 routing tests is a bit more complicated to setup. I'm using
OSPF, but I'm not seeing full routes formed in the topology, so I
suspect OSPF hellos aren't getting thru.
Please fix find/fix these issues and send v3. I don't want any git
bisect issues when running tests. Thanks.
-scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists