lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE4R7bA3dZ79U-Wg28m94=ZJBPRRQ2Xq=uM73ZrK5i2tNug=mg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 5 Oct 2015 22:16:29 -0700
From:	Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>, eladr@...lanox.com,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
	john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 06/13] rocker: introduce worlds infrastructure

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>
> This is another step on the way to per-world clean cut. Introduce world
> ops hooks which each world can implement in world-specific way.
> Also introduce world infrastructure including function for port worlds
> change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
>  - removed functions to change worlds based on name, as rtnl mode
>    set patch is removed from patchset.
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.h      |  56 ++++
>  drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c | 464 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 519 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.h
> index 650caa0..d49bc5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.h
> @@ -12,7 +12,11 @@
>  #ifndef _ROCKER_H
>  #define _ROCKER_H
>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/netdevice.h>
> +#include <net/neighbour.h>
> +#include <net/switchdev.h>
>
>  #include "rocker_hw.h"
>
> @@ -24,4 +28,56 @@ struct rocker_desc_info {
>         dma_addr_t mapaddr;
>  };
>
> +struct rocker;
> +struct rocker_port;
> +
> +struct rocker_world_ops {
> +       const char *kind;
> +       size_t priv_size;
> +       size_t port_priv_size;
> +       u8 mode;
> +       int (*init)(struct rocker *rocker, void *priv);
> +       void (*fini)(void *priv);
> +       int (*port_init)(struct rocker_port *rocker_port, void *priv,
> +                        void *port_priv);
> +       void (*port_fini)(void *port_priv);
> +       int (*port_open)(void *port_priv);
> +       void (*port_stop)(void *port_priv);
> +       int (*port_attr_stp_state_set)(void *port_priv, u8 state,
> +                                      struct switchdev_trans *trans);
> +       int (*port_attr_bridge_flags_set)(void *port_priv,
> +                                         unsigned long brport_flags,
> +                                         struct switchdev_trans *trans);
> +       int (*port_attr_bridge_flags_get)(void *port_priv,
> +                                         unsigned long *p_brport_flags);
> +       int (*port_obj_vlan_add)(void *port_priv,
> +                                const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *vlan,
> +                                struct switchdev_trans *trans);
> +       int (*port_obj_vlan_del)(void *port_priv,
> +                                const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *vlan);
> +       int (*port_obj_vlan_dump)(void *port_priv,
> +                                 struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *vlan,
> +                                 switchdev_obj_dump_cb_t *cb);
> +       int (*port_obj_fib4_add)(void *port_priv,
> +                                const struct switchdev_obj_ipv4_fib *fib4,
> +                                struct switchdev_trans *trans);
> +       int (*port_obj_fib4_del)(void *port_priv,
> +                                const struct switchdev_obj_ipv4_fib *fib4);
> +       int (*port_obj_fdb_add)(void *port_priv,
> +                               const struct switchdev_obj_port_fdb *fdb,
> +                               struct switchdev_trans *trans);
> +       int (*port_obj_fdb_del)(void *port_priv,
> +                               const struct switchdev_obj_port_fdb *fdb);
> +       int (*port_obj_fdb_dump)(void *port_priv,
> +                                struct switchdev_obj_port_fdb *fdb,
> +                                switchdev_obj_dump_cb_t *cb);
> +       int (*port_master_linked)(void *port_priv, struct net_device *master);
> +       int (*port_master_unlinked)(void *port_priv, struct net_device *master);
> +       int (*port_neigh_update)(void *port_priv, struct neighbour *n);
> +       int (*port_neigh_destroy)(void *port_priv, struct neighbour *n);
> +       int (*port_ev_mac_vlan_seen)(void *port_priv,
> +                                    const unsigned char *addr,
> +                                    __be16 vlan_id);
> +};

Yuck, void *.  Can we do better?

How about using base struct rocker_port and then sub-classing
world-specific rocker ports.  And make rocker_world_ops pass struct
rocker_port * (for the port-centric ops).

struct rocker_port {
    // common stuff for all worlds
};

struct my_world_port {
    struct rocker_port rocker_port;
    // world-specific stuff for port
};

#define MY_WORLD_PORT(rocker_port) \
        container_of(rocker_port, struct my_world_port, rocker_port)

Same for world-centric ops:

struct rocker_world {
   // common stuff for all worlds
};

struct my_world {
    struct rocker_world rocker_world;
    // stuff for this world
};


> +static int rocker_world_port_ev_mac_vlan_seen(struct rocker_port *rocker_port,
> +                                             const unsigned char *addr,
> +                                             __be16 vlan_id);
>
>  static int rocker_event_mac_vlan_seen(const struct rocker *rocker,
>                                       const struct rocker_tlv *info)
> @@ -1246,6 +1252,7 @@ static int rocker_event_mac_vlan_seen(const struct rocker *rocker,
>         const unsigned char *addr;
>         int flags = ROCKER_OP_FLAG_NOWAIT | ROCKER_OP_FLAG_LEARNED;
>         __be16 vlan_id;
> +       int err;
>
>         rocker_tlv_parse_nested(attrs, ROCKER_TLV_EVENT_MAC_VLAN_MAX, info);
>         if (!attrs[ROCKER_TLV_EVENT_MAC_VLAN_PPORT] ||
> @@ -1262,6 +1269,10 @@ static int rocker_event_mac_vlan_seen(const struct rocker *rocker,
>
>         rocker_port = rocker->ports[port_number];
>
> +       err = rocker_world_port_ev_mac_vlan_seen(rocker_port, addr, vlan_id);
> +       if (err)
> +               return err;
> +

Why is this in this patch?

> +static int rocker_world_port_attr_stp_state_set(struct rocker_port *rocker_port,
> +                                               u8 state,
> +                                               struct switchdev_trans *trans)
> +{
> +       struct rocker_world *world = rocker_port->world;
> +
> +       if (!world->ops->port_attr_stp_state_set)
> +               return 0;

Should return -EOPNOTSUPP.   Returning 0 means the operation
succeeded.   I would like to avoid silent failures.  If the user does
something to a port, and the operation is not supported on the port,
return -EOPNOTSUPP so user gets some feedback that operation failed.
Returning 0 gives the user feedback that the operation succeeded, when
in fact nothing happened at all.

> +       return world->ops->port_attr_stp_state_set(rocker_port->world_port_priv,
> +                                                  state, trans);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +rocker_world_port_attr_bridge_flags_set(struct rocker_port *rocker_port,
> +                                       unsigned long brport_flags,
> +                                       struct switchdev_trans *trans)
> +{
> +       struct rocker_world *world = rocker_port->world;
> +
> +       if (!world->ops->port_attr_bridge_flags_set)
> +               return 0;

Same comment, pretty much down the list...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ