netdev - [PATCH net-next] net: Do not drop to make

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1444232413-8435-1-git-send-email-dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date:	Wed,  7 Oct 2015 08:40:13 -0700
From:	David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	dsahern@...il.com, David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: Do not drop to make_route if oif is l3mdev

Commit deaa0a6a930 ("net: Lookup actual route when oif is VRF device")
exposed a bug in __ip_route_output_key_hash for VRF devices: on FIB lookup
failure if the oif is specified the current logic drops to make_route on
the assumption that the route tables are wrong. For VRF/L3 master devices
this leads to wrong dst entries and route lookups. For example:
    $ ip route ls table vrf-red
    unreachable default
    broadcast 10.2.1.0 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.2.1.2
    10.2.1.0/24 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.2.1.2
    local 10.2.1.2 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope host  src 10.2.1.2
    broadcast 10.2.1.255 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.2.1.2

    $ ip route get oif vrf-red 1.1.1.1
    1.1.1.1 dev vrf-red  src 10.0.0.2
        cache

With this patch:
    $  ip route get oif vrf-red 1.1.1.1
    RTNETLINK answers: No route to host

which is the correct response based on the default route

Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
---
 net/ipv4/route.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index bf1486bd7e81..f10ad88bfb89 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -2196,7 +2196,8 @@ struct rtable *__ip_route_output_key_hash(struct net *net, struct flowi4 *fl4,
 	if (err) {
 		res.fi = NULL;
 		res.table = NULL;
-		if (fl4->flowi4_oif) {
+		if (fl4->flowi4_oif &&
+		    !netif_index_is_l3_master(net, fl4->flowi4_oif)) {
 			/* Apparently, routing tables are wrong. Assume,
 			   that the destination is on link.
 
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html