[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151007123919.27a9c823@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 12:39:19 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [MM PATCH V4.1 5/6] slub: support for bulk free with SLUB
freelists
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 21:26:39 +0200 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:50:44 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
[...]
>
> > Deleting the BUG altogether sounds the best solution. As long as the
> > kernel crashes in some manner, we'll be able to work out what happened.
> > And it's cant-happen anyway, isn't it?
>
> To me WARN_ON() seems like a good "documentation" if it does not hurt
> performance. I don't think removing the WARN_ON() will improve
> performance, but I'm willing to actually test if it matters.
I tested removing BUG/WARN_ON altogether, and it gives slightly worse
performance. The icache-misses only increase approx 14% (not 112% as
before). This, I'm willing to attribute to some code alignment issue.
Thus, let us just keep the WARN_ON() and move along.
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists