[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201510071331.t97DVpgB031864@ignucius.se.axis.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 15:31:51 +0200
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nilsson@...s.com>
To: sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com
CC: sfr@...b.auug.org.au, starvik@...s.com, jespern@...s.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cris-kernel@...s.com,
jhs@...atatu.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 6
> From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 09:10:46 +0200
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:46:53PM +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > Thanks for the heads-up, but any chance of a bug report as per
> > the instructions in the message? It'll only speed up matters.
> I can try, but since I am using 4.6.3 version I doubt if I will get the
> required response (Happened with another arch).
Ow, way old.
> And this is the latest
> cris cross-compiler available in
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/
I have nothing to do with that.
> BTW, I did a bisect and if I revert 47bbbb30b433 ("sch_dsmark: improve memory locality")
> it again builds without any error.
Sorry, that's not really useful to me, neither are build logs.
What I need to proceed with fixing is preprocessed code and the
compiler options used, just as the bug-reporting instructions
say. Now that I hear that you get the ICE with a really old gcc
version, I'm not inclined to look further, sorry. Except, when
you mention the version I vaguely remember; it reminds me of a
bug fixed a long time ago. Maybe it was PR53120? Sorry, I
don't remember anything else useful. Still, thanks; it'll
shorten the response time if other people tell me the same
thing.
brgds, H-P
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists