[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17EC94B0A072C34B8DCF0D30AD16044A028747A3@BPXM09GP.gisp.nec.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 00:35:51 +0000
From: Kosuke Tatsukawa <tatsu@...jp.nec.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
"Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sunrpc: fix waitqueue_active without memory barrier in
sunrpc
There are several places in net/sunrpc/svcsock.c which calls
waitqueue_active() without calling a memory barrier. Change the code
to call wq_has_sleeper() instead, which other networking code uses in
similar places.
I found this issue when I was looking through the linux source code
for places calling waitqueue_active() before wake_up*(), but without
preceding memory barriers, after sending a patch to fix a similar
issue in drivers/tty/n_tty.c (Details about the original issue can be
found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/28/849).
Signed-off-by: Kosuke Tatsukawa <tatsu@...jp.nec.com>
---
net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 12 ++++++------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index 0c81202..cf081b8 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static void svc_udp_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
set_bit(XPT_DATA, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
svc_xprt_enqueue(&svsk->sk_xprt);
}
- if (wq && waitqueue_active(wq))
+ if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible(wq);
}
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static void svc_write_space(struct sock *sk)
svc_xprt_enqueue(&svsk->sk_xprt);
}
- if (wq && waitqueue_active(wq)) {
+ if (wq_has_sleeper(wq)) {
dprintk("RPC svc_write_space: someone sleeping on %p\n",
svsk);
wake_up_interruptible(wq);
@@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ static void svc_tcp_listen_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
}
wq = sk_sleep(sk);
- if (wq && waitqueue_active(wq))
+ if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_all(wq);
}
@@ -808,7 +808,7 @@ static void svc_tcp_state_change(struct sock *sk)
set_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
svc_xprt_enqueue(&svsk->sk_xprt);
}
- if (wq && waitqueue_active(wq))
+ if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_all(wq);
}
@@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ static void svc_tcp_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
set_bit(XPT_DATA, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
svc_xprt_enqueue(&svsk->sk_xprt);
}
- if (wq && waitqueue_active(wq))
+ if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible(wq);
}
@@ -1594,7 +1594,7 @@ static void svc_sock_detach(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
sk->sk_write_space = svsk->sk_owspace;
wq = sk_sleep(sk);
- if (wq && waitqueue_active(wq))
+ if (wq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible(wq);
}
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists