[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <561727D5.2070001@plumgrid.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 19:35:01 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To: "Devon H. O'Dell" <dho@...tly.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bpf, skb_do_redirect: clear sender_cpu before
xmit
On 10/8/15 5:50 PM, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
>> with the amount of skb_sender_cpu_clear() all over the code base
>> >I wonder whether there is a better solution to all of these.
> I think there is. We found that splitting the union of sender_cpu and
> napi_id solved the issue for us. In general, I think this is an OK
> solution as long as the following hold:
>
> * skbs are always allocated via kzalloc
> * out -> out cloned skbs are always cloned on the same CPU
> * an extra four bytes in skbuff isn't a bad thing
I'm pretty sure extending sk_buff for this is not acceptable.
I was thinking may be we can use sign bit to distinguish between
napi_id and sender_cpu.
Like:
if ((int)skb->sender_cpu >= 0)
skb->sender_cpu = - (raw_smp_processor_id() + 1);
and inside get_xps_queue() use it only if it's negative.
Then we can remove skb_sender_cpu_clear() from everywhere.
Adding a check to napi_hash_add() to make sure that napi_id is not
negative is probably ok too.
Thoughts?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists