netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] bridge: push bridge setting ageing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77EF4405DD4BB54AACCE7DB593DF6A9A9F6596@SJEXCHMB14.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
Date:	Fri, 9 Oct 2015 04:38:10 +0000
From:	Premkumar Jonnala <pjonnala@...adcom.com>
To:	"sfeldma@...il.com" <sfeldma@...il.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	"siva.mannem.lnx@...il.com" <siva.mannem.lnx@...il.com>,
	"stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	"roopa@...ulusnetworks.com" <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
	"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
	"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	"vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com" 
	<vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] bridge: push bridge setting ageing_time
 down to switchdev



> -----Original Message-----
> From: sfeldma@...il.com [mailto:sfeldma@...il.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 7:53 AM
> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; jiri@...nulli.us; siva.mannem.lnx@...il.com;
> Premkumar Jonnala; stephen@...workplumber.org;
> roopa@...ulusnetworks.com; andrew@...n.ch; f.fainelli@...il.com;
> vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
> Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] bridge: push bridge setting ageing_time down
> to switchdev
> 
> From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
> 
> Use SWITCHDEV_F_SKIP_EOPNOTSUPP to skip over ports in bridge that don't
> support setting ageing_time (or setting bridge attrs in general).
> 
> If push fails, don't update ageing_time in bridge and return err to user.
> 
> If push succeeds, update ageing_time in bridge and run gc_timer now to
> recalabrate when to run gc_timer next, based on new ageing_time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
> ---
>  net/bridge/br_ioctl.c    |    3 +--
>  net/bridge/br_netlink.c  |    6 +++---
>  net/bridge/br_private.h  |    1 +
>  net/bridge/br_stp.c      |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c |    3 +--
>  5 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_ioctl.c b/net/bridge/br_ioctl.c
> index 8d423bc..263b4de 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_ioctl.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_ioctl.c
> @@ -200,8 +200,7 @@ static int old_dev_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct
> ifreq *rq, int cmd)
>  		if (!ns_capable(dev_net(dev)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
>  			return -EPERM;
> 
> -		br->ageing_time = clock_t_to_jiffies(args[1]);
> -		return 0;
> +		return br_set_ageing_time(br, args[1]);
> 
>  	case BRCTL_GET_PORT_INFO:
>  	{
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> index d78b442..544ab96 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> @@ -870,9 +870,9 @@ static int br_changelink(struct net_device *brdev, struct
> nlattr *tb[],
>  	}
> 
>  	if (data[IFLA_BR_AGEING_TIME]) {
> -		u32 ageing_time = nla_get_u32(data[IFLA_BR_AGEING_TIME]);
> -
> -		br->ageing_time = clock_t_to_jiffies(ageing_time);
> +		err = br_set_ageing_time(br,
> nla_get_u32(data[IFLA_BR_AGEING_TIME]));
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
>  	}
> 
>  	if (data[IFLA_BR_STP_STATE]) {
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> index 09d3ecb..ba0c67b 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> @@ -882,6 +882,7 @@ void __br_set_forward_delay(struct net_bridge *br,
> unsigned long t);
>  int br_set_forward_delay(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long x);
>  int br_set_hello_time(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long x);
>  int br_set_max_age(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long x);
> +int br_set_ageing_time(struct net_bridge *br, u32 ageing_time);
> 
> 
>  /* br_stp_if.c */
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp.c b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> index 3a982c0..db6d243de 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> @@ -566,6 +566,29 @@ int br_set_max_age(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned
> long val)
> 
>  }
> 
> +int br_set_ageing_time(struct net_bridge *br, u32 ageing_time)
> +{
> +	struct switchdev_attr attr = {
> +		.id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_AGEING_TIME,
> +		.flags = SWITCHDEV_F_SKIP_EOPNOTSUPP,
> +		.u.ageing_time = ageing_time,
> +	};
> +	unsigned long t = clock_t_to_jiffies(ageing_time);
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (t < BR_MIN_AGEING_TIME || t > BR_MAX_AGEING_TIME)
> +		return -ERANGE;
> +
> +	err = switchdev_port_attr_set(br->dev, &attr);

A thought - given that the ageing time is not a per-bridge-port attr, why are we using a "port based api"
to pass the attribute down?  May be I'm missing something here?

-Prem


> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	br->ageing_time = t;
> +	mod_timer(&br->gc_timer, jiffies);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  void __br_set_forward_delay(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long t)
>  {
>  	br->bridge_forward_delay = t;
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c
> index 4c97fc5..04ef192 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c
> @@ -102,8 +102,7 @@ static ssize_t ageing_time_show(struct device *d,
> 
>  static int set_ageing_time(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val)
>  {
> -	br->ageing_time = clock_t_to_jiffies(val);
> -	return 0;
> +	return br_set_ageing_time(br, val);
>  }
> 
>  static ssize_t ageing_time_store(struct device *d,
> --
> 1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html