[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151009071710.GJ7701@secunet.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 09:17:10 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Hajime Tazaki <thehajime@...il.com>
CC: <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Fix vti use case with oif in dst lookups
for IPv6
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:54:22PM +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote:
>
> Hello David,
>
> At Mon, 5 Oct 2015 08:32:51 -0600,
> David Ahern wrote:
>
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
> > index 30caa289c5db..5cedfda4b241 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static struct dst_entry *xfrm6_dst_lookup(struct net *net, int tos, int oif,
> >
> > memset(&fl6, 0, sizeof(fl6));
> > fl6.flowi6_oif = oif;
> > + fl6.flowi6_flags = FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF;
> > memcpy(&fl6.daddr, daddr, sizeof(fl6.daddr));
> > if (saddr)
> > memcpy(&fl6.saddr, saddr, sizeof(fl6.saddr));
>
> I found that this fix is still not sufficient with the mip6
> (Mobile IPv6) use case.
It does not even fix the vti case. The behaviour of the vti devices is
the same, with and without the patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists