[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 09:30:05 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>, eladr@...lanox.com,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC 2/3] switchdev: allow caller to explicitly
use deferred attr_set version
Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 04:43:43AM CEST, sfeldma@...il.com wrote:
<snip>
>
>>
>>>
>>>patch 3/3 I haven't looked at yet...I'm stuck on 2/3.
>>
>> It is very similar to 2/3, only for obj_add/del.
>
>Do we have examples of a deferred obj add or del? Maybe we should
>hold off adding that support until someone finds a use-case. I'm kind
>of hoping there isn't a use-case, but who knows?
Just look at the patch :) fdb_del_external_learn()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists