lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 9 Oct 2015 19:51:20 -0700
From:	Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
	Elad Raz <eladr@...lanox.com>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
	john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 00/13] rocker: add support for multiple worlds

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 07:39:56PM CEST, jiri@...nulli.us wrote:
>>Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 06:53:22PM CEST, sfeldma@...il.com wrote:
>>>On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>>>> Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 07:14:39PM CEST, sfeldma@...il.com wrote:
>>>>>On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>>>>>> Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 05:56:12AM CEST, sfeldma@...il.com wrote:
>>>>>>>On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>>>>>>>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This patchset allows new rocker worlds to be easily added in future (like eBPF
>>>>>>>> based one I have been working on). The main part of the patchset is the OF-DPA
>>>>>>>> carve-out. It resuts in OF-DPA specific file. Clean cut.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> v1->v2:
>>>>>>>>  - rtnl rocker mode change userspace expose patch was removed
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jiri Pirko (13):
>>>>>>>>   rocker: remove unused rocker_port param from alloc funcs and shorten
>>>>>>>>     their names
>>>>>>>>   rocker: rename rocker.h to rocker_hw.h
>>>>>>>>   rocker: rename rocker.c to rocker_main.c
>>>>>>>>   rocker: push tlv processing into separate files
>>>>>>>>   rocker: implement set settings mode command
>>>>>>>>   rocker: introduce worlds infrastructure
>>>>>>>>   rocker: introduce OF-DPA world skeleton
>>>>>>>>   rocker: set default world on port probe and clean world on remove
>>>>>>>>   rocker: pass "learning" value as a parameter to
>>>>>>>>     rocker_port_set_learning
>>>>>>>>   rocker: pre-allocate wait structures during cmd ring init
>>>>>>>>   rocker: remove trans parameter to rocker_cmd_exec function
>>>>>>>>   rocker: call rocker_cmd_exec function with "nowait" boolean instead of
>>>>>>>>     flags
>>>>>>>>   rocker: move OF-DPA stuff into separate file
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>A couple of my tests are failing with this patchset.  A simple port
>>>>>>>test is failing and IPv4 routing test is failing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The port test is simple: just connect a port on DUT to a port on
>>>>>>>another system and assign an IP address to each port and verify IP
>>>>>>>connectivity.  I have this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   DUT:sw1p1 (11.0.0.1/24) <-----------> host1:eth0 (11.0.0.2/24)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The IPv4 routing tests is a bit more complicated to setup.  I'm using
>>>>>>>OSPF, but I'm not seeing full routes formed in the topology, so I
>>>>>>>suspect OSPF hellos aren't getting thru.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Please fix find/fix these issues and send v3.  I don't want any git
>>>>>>>bisect issues when running tests.  Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I fixed that. Sending v3 in a sec. Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>Sorry, both tests are still broken.  Would you send me your tests
>>>>>scripts so I can see why your tests are passing?
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying some smoke tests including bridge setup and just ip-ip
>>>> setup by hand. Meybe if you send me your scripts, I can run it locally.
>>>
>>>My test scripts are already included in the qemu tree.
>>
>>Okay, will rework and use your scripts. Hope I will find some time
>>during this weekend.
>
> Scott, could you try to test with current net-next?
> I'm trying basic:
> DUT:sw1p1 (11.0.0.1/24) <-----------> host1:eth0 (11.0.0.2/24)
> and it does not work for me now. It worked previously when I tested with
> my patchset. This is getting odd.

I had just re-run the tests against net-next before submitting the
ageing_time patchset and everything passes.

Are you using a namespace or a VM for host1?  Either one should work.

This would be a bad test, as the kernel will loop the traffic and the
offload device will not see it:

DUT:sw1p1 (11.0.0.1/24) <-------->DUT:sw1p2(11.0.0.2/24)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ