netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 01/10] qed: Add module with basic common support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20151011.041608.1224841508064967134.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 11 Oct 2015 04:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Ariel.Elior@...gic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 01/10] qed: Add module with basic common
 support

From: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 14:18:18 +0000

> So far we've worked on stabalizing it on 64-bit LE endian.
> I can easily understand why we'd want to relax this restriction later on
> [and sooner rather than later], but what would you gain be gained by
> compile-fixing for platforms on which it was never tested?

This is exactly the kind of attitude I don't want to see.

I am so glad that so many driver authors supported all PCI platforms
from the very beginning so that casually I could test their driver on
my sparc64 systems.

There is huge value in expanding the compiler testing your driver
gets, from day one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html