[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151012175156.GA16784@colbert.mtl.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:51:56 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>, <sfeldma@...il.com>,
<vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <shm@...ulusnetworks.com>,
<roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>, <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
<bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] bridge: vlan: combine (br|nbp)_vlan_flush
into one
Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:41:09PM IDT, razor@...ckwall.org wrote:
>From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
>
>As Ido Schimmel pointed out the vlan_vid_del() loop in nbp_vlan_flush is
>unnecessary (and is actually a remnant of the old vlan code) so we can
>remove it and combine both br/nbp vlan_flush functions into one.
Just a small note to Scott and Vivien:
One of the side effects of Nik's recent patchsets is that when VLANs are
flushed on a port the deletion is propagated to the driver via
switchdev ops, as __vlan_vid_del is called.
Therefore there is no need to do internal bookkeeping and remove VLANs
yourself when port is removed from bridge.
>
>Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists