[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151013000221.GD88112@canlin-mbp1.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 17:02:21 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
<jmorris@...ei.org>, <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<syzkaller@...glegroups.com>, Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: Don't call with rt6_uncached_list_flush_dev
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:02:08AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> As originally written rt6_uncached_list_flush_dev makes no sense when
> called with dev == NULL as it attempts to flush all uncached routes
> regardless of network namespace when dev == NULL. Which is simply
> incorrect behavior.
Thanks for fixing it.
Reviewed-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
I also tested the following cases with the presence of DST_NOCACHE entries:
1. rmmod e1000.ko while running netperf
2. unshare(CLONE_NEWNET) as reported by Dmitry
Tested-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists