netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: write MAC outside of ATU Get Next code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:43:56 -0700
From:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: write MAC outside
 of ATU Get Next code

On 13/10/15 11:11, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> On Oct. Tuesday 13 (42) 10:35 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 13/10/15 09:46, Vivien Didelot wrote:
>>> There is no need to write the MAC address before every Get Next
>>> operation, since ATU MAC registers are not cleared between calls.
>>>
>>> Move the _mv88e6xxx_atu_mac_write call outside of _mv88e6xxx_atu_getnext
>>> so future code could call ATU Get Next multiple times and save a few
>>> register access.
>>
>> Missing SoB tag here.
> 
> Damn, good catch. Can I add it in reply to the patch, or should I send a
> v3?

I am fairly positive patchwork should be able to pick it up, so replying
to your patch might just do it fine.
-- 
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html