[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151014224617.GA10146@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:46:17 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix hardware bridging
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 06:08:34PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> DSA and its drivers currently hook the NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER net_device event in
> order to configure the VLAN map of every port.
>
> This VLAN map is a feature of these switch chips to hardcode and restrict which
> output ports a given input port can egress frames to.
>
> A Linux bridge is a simple untagged VLAN propagated by the bridge code itself.
> With a proper 802.1Q support, a driver does not need this hook anymore, and
> will simply program the related VLAN object.
>
> This patchset improves the hardware bridging code in the mv88e6xxx driver with
> a strict 802.1Q mode.
Hi Vivien
I just tested this as part of net-next/master, and found a problem....
If i do:
ip link set lan0 up
ip addr add 192.168.10.2/24 dev lan0
It will not ping. Looking in sys/kernel/debug/dsa0/stats i see
broadcast packets, probably ARP, being received at the port.
But they are not being forwarded out the CPU port.
If however i do
brctl addbr br0
brctl addif br0 lan0
ip addr add 192.168.10.2/24 dev br0
ip link set br0 up
i can ping.
So it looks like we are too restrictive by default. You should be able
to use interfaces as they are, without a bridge.
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists