[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <561DD749.9000802@denx.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:17:13 +0200
From: Heiko Schocher <hs@...x.de>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Georg.Soffel@...ch-si.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: smsc: disable energy detect mode
Hello Florian,
Am 13.10.2015 um 21:26 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
> On 12/10/15 22:13, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> On some boards the energy enable detect mode leads in
>> trouble with some switches, so make the enabling of
>> this mode configurable through DT.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@...x.de>
>> ---
>>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/net/smsc-lan87xx.txt | 19 +++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/net/phy/smsc.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-----
>> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/smsc-lan87xx.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/smsc-lan87xx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/smsc-lan87xx.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..39aa1dc
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/smsc-lan87xx.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
>> +SMSC LAN87xx Ethernet PHY
>> +
>> +Some boards require special tuning values. Configure them
>> +through an Ethernet OF device node.
>> +
>> +Optional properties:
>> +
>> +- disable-energy-detect:
>> + If set, do not enable energy detect mode for the SMSC phy.
>> + default: enable energy detect mode
>
> Although energy detection is something that is implemented by many PHYs,
> I am not sure a generic property is suitable here, I would prefix that
> with the SMSC vendor prefix here to make it clear this only applies to
> this PHY.
Hmm... but all PHYs should be able to enable, disable it in some way, or?
> Would not you want to make it a reverse property here though, something
> like this:
>
> smsc,energy-detect: boolean, when present indicates the PHY reliably
> supports energy detection
Yes, that was also my first thought, but currently, on this PHYs
energy detect mode is on ... and if I introduce such a property,
it will disable it for all existing boards, because property is
missing ... so, maybe I break boards ...
>> +
>> +Examples:
>> +
>> + /* Attach to an Ethernet device with autodetected PHY */
>> + &cpsw_emac0 {
>> + phy_id = <&davinci_mdio>, <0>;
>> + phy-mode = "mii";
>> + disable-energy-detect;
>> + };
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c b/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
>> index 70b0895..f90fbf3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
>> @@ -43,16 +43,30 @@ static int smsc_phy_ack_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev)
>>
>> static int smsc_phy_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> + int len;
>> + struct device *dev = &phydev->dev;
>> + struct device_node *of_node = dev->of_node;
>
> That does not need to be ifdefd out, at best annontate with __maybe_unused?
Yes, I try it.
>> +#endif
>> int rc = phy_read(phydev, MII_LAN83C185_CTRL_STATUS);
>> + int enable_energy = 1;
>>
>> if (rc < 0)
>> return rc;
>>
>> - /* Enable energy detect mode for this SMSC Transceivers */
>> - rc = phy_write(phydev, MII_LAN83C185_CTRL_STATUS,
>> - rc | MII_LAN83C185_EDPWRDOWN);
>> - if (rc < 0)
>> - return rc;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> + if (!of_node && dev->parent->of_node)
>> + of_node = dev->parent->of_node;
>
> That looks strange, why would the property be placed at the parent level
> when this is a PHY device tree node property?
Hmm.. I recheck this.
>> + if (of_find_property(of_node, "disable-energy-detect", &len))
>> + enable_energy = 0;
>> +#endif
>> + if (enable_energy) {
>> + /* Enable energy detect mode for this SMSC Transceivers */
>> + rc = phy_write(phydev, MII_LAN83C185_CTRL_STATUS,
>> + rc | MII_LAN83C185_EDPWRDOWN);
>> + if (rc < 0)
>> + return rc;
>> + }
>>
>> return smsc_phy_ack_interrupt(phydev);
>> }
>>
Thanks for your review.
bye,
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists