[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1444812287.2143451.409784161.5A6B4523@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:44:47 +0200
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@...il.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ICMPv6 too big Packet will makes the network unreachable
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015, at 08:44, Li RongQing wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:26 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> <hannes@...essinduktion.org> wrote:
> >> root@du1:~# ip route get 2001:1b70:82a8:18:650:65:0:2
> >> 2001:1b70:82a8:18:650:65:0:2 dev eth10.650 src
> >> 2001:1b70:82a8:18:650:65:0:2 metric 0
> >> cache
> >> root@du1:~#
> >
> > Which kernel version did you test this on?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hannes
>
>
> I think it is all version
I wonder very much because in tests I definitely hit the
static void __ip6_rt_update_pmtu(struct dst_entry *dst, const struct
sock *sk,
const struct ipv6hdr *iph, u32 mtu)
{
struct rt6_info *rt6 = (struct rt6_info *)dst;
if (rt6->rt6i_flags & RTF_LOCAL)
return;
RTF_LOCAL check all the times. Which kernel version did you on
specifically?
Thanks,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists