[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151015153236.GA3989@kllt-03>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 23:32:36 +0800
From: Kenneth Lee <Kenneth-Lee-2012@...mail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, joe@...ches.com, liguozhu@...ilicon.com,
Yisen.Zhuang@...wei.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linuxarm@...wei.com, salil.mehta@...wei.com, xuwei5@...ilicon.com,
lisheng011@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
huangdaode <huangdaode@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] hisilicon net: removes the once
HANDEL_TX_MSG macro
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 04:18:23PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:18:23 +0200
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> To: Kenneth Lee <Kenneth-Lee-2012@...mail.com>
> Cc: davem@...emloft.net, joe@...ches.com, liguozhu@...ilicon.com,
> Yisen.Zhuang@...wei.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...wei.com,
> salil.mehta@...wei.com, kenneth-lee-2012@...mail.com,
> xuwei5@...ilicon.com, lisheng011@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
> huangdaode <huangdaode@...ilicon.com>
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] hisilicon net: removes the
> once HANDEL_TX_MSG macro
> Message-ID: <6914069.XLdT9Eli48@...rfel>
>
> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 21:27:12 Kenneth Lee wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Arnd,
> >
> > Thank you for the comment. Yes, the io_base is a security problem, we
> > will fix it in coming patch soon.
> >
> > But can we keep the sysfs? The interface from hnae is not used only by
> > ethernet driver but also by Open Data Plane driver. If we more it to
> > upper layers. Both drivers will have the same logic.
> >
> > So how about we just add documents to Documention/ABI?
>
> Hi Kenneth,
>
> In the end this is up to David Miller of course, but I'd say we are
> better off not introducing any ABIs for ODP prematurely.
>
> We are talking about very generic statistics data, and you should
> already provide them for the ethernet driver using the standard
> interfaces.
>
> I have not seen any discussion about adding an ODP subsystem for
> the Linux kernel, or what the API will be, but I think we should
> not export any interfaces from a particular device driver directly
> but always go through a common layer here and use an extensible
> interface that can be implemented by everyone.
>
> The API has not been part of a release yet, so I'd say we should
> remove it for now. Once we have a net/odp/ directory, we can
> add a driver-independent implementation there and call it from
> the hisi driver.
>
> Arnd
Hi, Arnd,
Agree. We will remove the interface for the time being. Thank you.
--
-Kenneth Lee (Hisilicon)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists