[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1510160935310.22648@linux-builds1>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:38:37 -0500
From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <david.daney@...ium.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SoCFPGA ethernet broken
On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Another debugging point, the SoCFPGA board has a Micrel ksz9021 PHY attached
> > to the ethernet port. What I'm seeing is that with 8b63ec1837fa patch, when
> > the call to ksz9021_config_init() is made both of_node and dev->parent->of_node
> > are NULL, without the patch the dev->parent->of_node is a valid pointer. Thus
> > the skew values get programmed to the phy.
>
> Ah!
>
> You have the phy device tree parameters in the wrong place. These are
> phy paramters, so should really be in the phy node. But
> socfpga_cyclone5_socdk.dts has them in the MAC node.
>
Alright, let me see if I can rework the DTS.
> There is nothing in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/micrel.txt
> which says you are allowed to place them in the MAC node. Obviously
> the code did allow this, which is what has now broken.
>
I was following Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/micrel-ksz90x1.txt and
in this document I was following the autodetected PHY example. Did I mis-interpret
the example?
BR,
Dinh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists