netdev - Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALe+Z02gaON+Zan0HbL6X3omwiVYEd4-uayA8sQ+BQmU3x7V0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:12:56 +0200
From:	Jan Blunck <jblunck@...radead.org>
To:	David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, davem@...emloft.net,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>, jmorris@...ei.org,
	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	fubar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:02 PM, David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> On 10/16/15 9:57 AM, Jan Blunck wrote:
>>
>>
>> I don't think that enslaved ports should get network layer addresses.
>> This is one example with a team device:
>
>
> for VRF devices we do want the enslaved links to have link local addresses.
>

That is interesting. As far I can see you are setting IFF_SLAVE in
do_vrf_add_slave() and therefore already stop IPv6 addrconf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html