netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: hix5hd2_gmac: avoid integer overload warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <562146ED.1030308@cogentembedded.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Oct 2015 21:50:21 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
	huangdaode <huangdaode@...ilicon.com>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"liguozhu@...ilicon.com" <liguozhu@...ilicon.com>,
	"Yisen.Zhuang@...wei.com" <Yisen.Zhuang@...wei.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linuxarm@...wei.com" <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
	"salil.mehta@...wei.com" <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
	"kenneth-lee-2012@...mail.com" <kenneth-lee-2012@...mail.com>,
	"xuwei5@...ilicon.com" <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
	"lisheng011@...wei.com" <lisheng011@...wei.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"lipeng321@...wei.com" <lipeng321@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: hix5hd2_gmac: avoid integer overload warning

On 10/16/2015 09:04 PM, Joe Perches wrote:

>>>> BITS_RX_EN is an 'unsigned long' constant, so the ones complement of that
>>>> has bits set that do not fit into a 32-bit variable on 64-bit architectures,
>>>> which causes a harmless gcc warning:
>>> ...
>>>>   static void hix5hd2_port_disable(struct hix5hd2_priv *priv)
>>>>   {
>>>> -     writel_relaxed(~(BITS_RX_EN | BITS_TX_EN), priv->base + PORT_EN);
>>>> +     writel_relaxed(~(u32)(BITS_RX_EN | BITS_TX_EN), priv->base + PORT_EN);
>>>>        writel_relaxed(0, priv->base + DESC_WR_RD_ENA);
>>>
>>> ISTM that just means that the constants shouldn't be 'long'.
>>
>> Right, but that would probably mean changing the BIT() macro or not using it
>> here. In the past I've argued against using that macro, but I've given
>> up that fight.
>
> Fight on... (Somebody must have gone to USC here)
>
> There might be value in a BIT_U32 macro.
> Maybe BIT_U64 too.

    There's BIT_ULL() already.

MBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html