[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151016092212.GA1092@salvia>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:22:12 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Nikolay Borisov <n.borisov@...eground.com>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
Nikolay Borisov <kernel@...p.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
SiteGround Operations <operations@...eground.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netfilter: ipset: Fix sleeping memory allocation in
atomic context
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 01:53:11PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 23:20 +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
> > While GFP_ATOMIC does indeed look the correct solution for this particular
> > case I was wondering whether something like (GFP_KERNEL & ~__GFP_WAIT)
> > wouldn't also make the cut without causing sleeping? I guess this is exactly
> > the sort of situation that Mel Gorman's patch can address
> > (marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=144283282101953) ?
>
> This is not applicable here, because the caller would have to find a way
> to keep trying.
>
> I believe one way to handle this problem (in a followup patch) would be
> to use a work queue for the gc, not a timer.
>
> Using a timer for gc is almost always subject to big problems anyway.
Agreed, this is what we're doing in nft_hash. Thanks for feedback Eric!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists