[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151016092831.GK32638@zion.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:28:31 +0100
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
To: Insu Yun <wuninsu@...il.com>
CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Taesoo Kim <taesoo@...ech.edu>,
Yeongjin Jang <yeongjin.jang@...ech.edu>,
"Yun, Insu" <insu@...ech.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-netback: correctly check failed allocation
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:05:21AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 02:02:47PM -0400, Insu Yun wrote:
> > I changed patch with valid format.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Insu Yun <wuninsu@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Since vzalloc can be failed in memory pressure,
> > > writes -ENOMEM to xenstore to indicate error.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Insu Yun <wuninsu@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 6 ++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c
> > > b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c
> > > index 929a6e7..56ebd82 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c
> > > @@ -788,6 +788,12 @@ static void connect(struct backend_info *be)
> > > /* Use the number of queues requested by the frontend */
> > > be->vif->queues = vzalloc(requested_num_queues *
> > > sizeof(struct xenvif_queue));
> > > + if (!be->vif->queues) {
> > > + xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, -ENOMEM,
> > > + "allocating queues");
> > > + return;
> > >
> >
> > I didn't use goto err, because another error handling is not required
> >
>
> It's recommended in kernel coding style to use "goto" style error
> handling. I personally prefer that to arbitrary return in function body,
> too.
>
> It's not a matter of whether another error handling is required or not,
> it's about cleaner code that is easy to reason about and consistent
> coding style.
>
> The existing code is not perfect, but that doesn't mean we should follow
> bad example.
And to be clear, I don't want to block this patch just because of this
coding style thing. It's still an improvement and fix a real problem.
So:
Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists