netdev - Re: [PATCH net] tunnels: Don't require remote endpoint or ID during creation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20151018.224439.2162951217660850579.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jesse@...ira.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linville@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tunnels: Don't require remote endpoint or ID
 during creation.

From: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:36:00 -0700

> Before lightweight tunnels existed, it really didn't make sense to
> create a tunnel that was not fully specified, such as without a
> destination IP address - the resulting packets would go nowhere.
> However, with lightweight tunnels, the opposite is true - it doesn't
> make sense to require this information when it will be provided later
> on by the route. This loosens the requirements for this information.
> 
> An alternative would be to allow the relaxed version only when
> COLLECT_METADATA is enabled. However, since there are several
> variations on this theme (such as NBMA tunnels in GRE), just dropping
> the restrictions seems the most consistent across tunnels and with
> the existing configuration.
> 
> CC: John Linville <linville@...driver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>

Applied, thanks Jesse.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html