[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151021233211.GF23554@pox.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 01:32:11 +0200
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: Jarno Rajahalme <jrajahalme@...ira.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, dev@...nvswitch.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/5] netfilter: Remove IP_CT_NEW_REPLY
definition.
On 10/21/15 at 01:15pm, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> > On Oct 21, 2015, at 1:33 AM, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> wrote:
> > I understand what you are doing here but this is part of the published
> > UAPI and removing this might break compilation of a user application
> > even if the definition is not used right now. It's probably safer to
> > leave the definition and obsolete it with a comment.
>
> OK. I should probably separate the netlink and openvswitch changes to separate patches as well?
Given that at that point the changes become unrelated, I'd split
it into separate patches, yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists